RIFTCOMBO

Combo · ENGINE

The Candlelit Sanctum chooses which of the top two you draw next, and 431.1.c makes it safe with the deck empty

1 card · any legend · verified

Pieces

Payoff

Repeatable card advantage

Deck

Prerequisites

Steps

  1. Bring The Candlelit Sanctum as one of your three battlefields.
  2. Conquer it. 348.2.a.1 fires the trigger; look at the top two cards of your Main Deck.
  3. Recycle whichever you do not want — 416.1.a puts it on the bottom of the Main Deck — and put the one you do want back on top, which the clause lets you choose ('in any order').
  4. 315.4.b draws that card in your Draw Phase, so the next draw is a card you picked rather than one you rolled.
  5. If both are dead, recycle both: 416.5 puts them on the bottom in a random order, and the next two cards up are fresh.
  6. Give the battlefield up and retake it to repeat — the conquer engine this entry needs.

Per iteration

two dead cards buried and the next draw chosen, per Conquer at this battlefield, for no Energy and no cards

How it ends

engine only — pure selection at whatever rate the conquer engine supplies; it draws nothing, scores nothing, and 431.1.c means it never risks a Burn Out

Sources

Published elsewhere

Walked here, in this project

How this entry was audited

REFUTE = a refutation pass, with its date and verdict · WOUNDED = the pass found a flaw and the entry was rewritten · BUDGETED = the pass checked the recycle-and-draw ledger · lens = the hunt that proposed it.

HAND-WALKED 2026-09-07, issue #171 — the first entry to use OGN-291, and a one-card entry on purpose: the battlefield is the whole line and the partner is whatever conquer engine feeds it, which `needs` expresses better than a named card would. Card text verbatim from data/corpus_flat.txt. It refines rather than contradicts the project's standing 'no card turns a draw probability into a certainty' finding, and the refinement is stated in those terms so the two records agree. Trap check: 416.1.a and 416.5 are quoted so recycling is not imagined to stack the bottom; 424.1 is cited so looking is not mistaken for revealing; 431.1.c is quoted because it is what makes this usable in an empty-deck shell where 431.1.a and 431.1.b are not; the needs declaration is contrasted with sunken-temple-mighty-conquer-draw's extra Might condition; exactly one battlefield is named, so 485.4.a is respected.

Walked against Core Rules 2026-07-16

Match a deck list against the whole catalogue