RIFTCOMBO

Combo · ENGINE

Two bodies that are only big while attacking, and 144.3 brings them for one action - but an empty battlefield pays neither

6 cards · order · verified

Pieces

Payoff

Combat Might

Deck

Prerequisites

Steps

  1. Develop Crimson Pigeons (3 Energy) and Laurent Duelist (4 Energy) at your base or a battlefield you hold.
  2. Declare one Standard Move for both to the same enemy-held battlefield: 144.3 makes it a single game action, 144.3.a fixes the shared destination and 144.3.c pays both exhausts at once.
  3. Contested is applied, 323.9 stages the Combat because opposing units are present, and 464.2.c.3 hands out the Attacker designation.
  4. Both conditions are now met: [Assault 2] gives the Duelist +2 (807.1.c) and the Pigeons read '+2 while I'm attacking with another unit'. Summed Might is 10.
  5. 465.2.c assigns that 10 among the defenders, capped per body at minimum lethal by 465.2.c.4; whatever is never assigned is excess damage for a payoff that reads it.
  6. Do NOT run this line into an empty battlefield: with no opposing units 323.9 stages no Combat, 464.2.c.3 never happens, and both cards are Might 3.

Per iteration

+4 summed attacking Might for 7 Energy and no Power, on any attack into a garrisoned battlefield

How it ends

engine only - a per-attack Might bonus, three of each body by 103.2.b, worth nothing on an unoccupied battlefield (807.1.d + 323.9); nothing here scores

Sources

Published elsewhere

Walked here, in this project

How this entry was audited

REFUTE = a refutation pass, with its date and verdict · WOUNDED = the pass found a flaw and the entry was rewritten · BUDGETED = the pass checked the recycle-and-draw ledger · lens = the hunt that proposed it.

HAND-WALKED 2026-09-07 (issue #180, batch 6). The first entry to use UNL-154 Crimson Pigeons or SFD-156 Laurent Duelist. Card text verbatim from data/corpus_flat.txt. Citations opened and quoted: 103.1.b.3, 103.2.b, 144.3, 144.3.a, 144.3.b, 144.3.c, 323.9, 344.2, 420.3.a, 464.2.c.3, 465.2.c, 465.2.c.4, 469, 702.3, 703, 807.1.c, 807.1.d, 807.2. The empty-battlefield trap is stated as a prerequisite AND as a step, because this pair is exactly the kind of cheap attacking package a reader would otherwise point at an evacuated battlefield. The excess-damage payoffs are named in a notable rather than put in uses[], since each already has its own entry and none of them is required for this one to be true. Ban check: neither card is banned or restricted; neither is a Signature card. No unruled reading.

Walked against Core Rules 2026-07-16

Match a deck list against the whole catalogue