RIFTCOMBO

Combo · ENGINE

Cull the Weak is 355.10.e's own worked example, so it cannot be Deflected — and Loyal Poro makes the half you pay draw you a card

6 cards · order · verified

Pieces

Payoff

Repeatable removalRepeatable card advantage

Deck

Prerequisites

Steps

  1. Play Loyal Poro (E3) and keep it standing with at least one other friendly unit — 740.2.a measures 'alone' at its location, so a lone Poro at a battlefield does not qualify.
  2. Cast Cull the Weak (E2 + 1 Order Power). It targets nothing (355.10.e), so no Deflect Value is added to its cost however protected their board is.
  3. On resolution each player chooses one of their own units and kills it. You choose the Poro; they choose whatever they can spare.
  4. The Poro's Deathknell resolves from the Trash: it did not die alone, so you draw 1.
  5. Repeat with the second and third copy. 103.2.b caps both halves at three.

Per iteration

one enemy unit dead anywhere on their board and one card drawn, for E2 + 1 Order Power and a body that replaced itself

How it ends

engine only — three castings (103.2.b), each costing the opponent a unit of their choice and costing you a card-neutral Poro; nothing here scores

Sources

Published elsewhere

Walked here, in this project

How this entry was audited

REFUTE = a refutation pass, with its date and verdict · WOUNDED = the pass found a flaw and the entry was rewritten · BUDGETED = the pass checked the recycle-and-draw ledger · lens = the hunt that proposed it.

HAND-WALKED 2026-09-07, issue #180 — the first entry to use OGN-209 or UNL-156. Card text verbatim from data/corpus_flat.txt. Cull the Weak's wording is Riot's own worked example for 355.10.e, which is the strongest citation shape this project recognises. Trap check: the entry states plainly that the opponent picks their own casualty, so it is not sold as aimed removal; 740.2.a is cited for 'alone' in place of the reminder text the project had been reading it off, and the second body it implies is stated as a requirement on the Poro's zone rather than left in prose; 808.1.a and 808.1.d.1 are checked so the Deathknell is known to fire (nothing replaces this death); 355.10.f is named as the sibling clause so the two are not conflated.

Walked against Core Rules 2026-07-16

Match a deck list against the whole catalogue