RIFTCOMBO

Combo · ENGINE

Heisho is one of only two cards in the pool that ignore [Deflect], and the only one that does it for every spell and ability, repeatedly

4 cards · body · verified

Pieces

Payoff

Repeatable removal

Deck

Prerequisites

Bodies no card supplies

Play Challenge (E2 + 1 Body Power) choosing one of your units and one enemy unit standing at Heisho

Steps

  1. Bring Heisho, Shell of the World as one of your three battlefields, in a deck whose own units do not rely on [Deflect]. It needs no Control: there is no 'you' in its text.
  2. Let the fight happen at Heisho — either the opponent garrisons it, or you attack into it after they take it.
  3. Play Challenge (E2 + 1 Body Power) choosing one of your units and one enemy unit standing at Heisho. Because the enemy unit is here, 809.1.c's additional Power cost is not paid, however large its Deflect Value.
  4. The two units deal damage equal to their Mights to each other. 143.2.a kills on nonzero damage equalling or exceeding Might, and 143.3.b.1 heals whatever survives at the end of the turn.
  5. Repeat with the other two copies; the discount applies to every spell and every ability that chooses something at this battlefield, not only to this one.

Per iteration

up to 2 rainbow Power saved per choice made at this battlefield — the whole Deflect tax, for the rest of the game

How it ends

engine only — an unbounded waiver of the Deflect tax at one battlefield; it scores nothing, and the named payoff is capped at three castings by 103.2.b

Sources

Published elsewhere

Walked here, in this project

How this entry was audited

REFUTE = a refutation pass, with its date and verdict · WOUNDED = the pass found a flaw and the entry was rewritten · BUDGETED = the pass checked the recycle-and-draw ledger · lens = the hunt that proposed it.

HAND-WALKED 2026-09-07, issue #171 — the first entry to use VEN-158 or OGN-128. Card text verbatim from data/corpus_flat.txt. The uniqueness claim names both members (VEN-061 and VEN-158) so the next grep refutes it in one command, per the #175 correction. Trap check: 355.10.d is cited so the entry does not overclaim — half the removal in the pool never pays the tax at all; the symmetry is stated together with the four specific cards it makes this battlefield wrong for, rather than as a general caveat; 809.1.c.1 is cited so the tax is not assumed to be domain-matched; exactly one battlefield is named, so 485.4.a is respected.

Walked against Core Rules 2026-07-16

Match a deck list against the whole catalogue