RIFTCOMBO

Combo · ENGINE

Sunken Temple is a Monastery of Hirana gated on 5+ Might — and that gate is exactly what the catalogue's cheapest conquer engine cannot supply

4 cards · body · verified

Pieces

Payoff

Repeatable card advantage

Deck

Prerequisites

Steps

  1. Bring Sunken Temple as one of your three battlefields, in a deck whose conquering body is 5 Might or more.
  2. Conquer it with that body — either the bloodless 344.2 route against an empty battlefield, or a real Combat that 323.9 stages against a garrison.
  3. 348.2.a establishes Control and 348.2.a.1 makes it a Conquer. The Temple's trigger checks its condition: at least one [Mighty] unit among those that conquered here.
  4. Pay 1 Energy on resolution and draw 1.
  5. Give the battlefield up and retake it to repeat — 315.2.b.2's mandatory Hold plus 470 mean a battlefield taken and kept fires its conquer clause exactly once.

Per iteration

one card for 1 Energy, per Conquer at Sunken Temple made with a 5+ Might body

How it ends

engine only — one card per Conquer, at whatever rate the conquer engine supplies and only while the conquering body is 5+ Might; nothing here scores

Sources

Published elsewhere

Walked here, in this project

How this entry was audited

REFUTE = a refutation pass, with its date and verdict · WOUNDED = the pass found a flaw and the entry was rewritten · BUDGETED = the pass checked the recycle-and-draw ledger · lens = the hunt that proposed it.

HAND-WALKED 2026-09-07, issue #171 — the first entry to use SFD-218. Card text verbatim from data/corpus_flat.txt. The entry exists to record a limit of the DAG as much as a line: a `needs` feature tag cannot carry an extra condition, so this walk's own Sprite Queen cycle satisfies the tag and fails the card. That is stated in the notable rather than left for a reader to discover. Trap check: 709 is cited so the Mighty STATE is not confused with the 'becomes Mighty' EVENT; 383.3.b and 205 are cited to place the cost on resolution, in explicit contrast with monastery-hirana-warmogs-conquer-draw; 470 + 315.2.b.2 are cited for why the needs declaration is there at all; exactly one battlefield is named, so 485.4.a is respected.

Walked against Core Rules 2026-07-16

Match a deck list against the whole catalogue