RIFTCOMBO

Combo · ENGINE

Switcheroo is a 2D swing, not a D one, and 433.1.c is the trap printed in the rules - swap the Poro, never Tryndamere

5 cards · chaos + fury · verified

Pieces

Payoff

Score arbitrary points

Deck

Prerequisites

Steps

  1. Play OGN-013 Pouty Poro (2 Energy) and OGN-034 Tryndamere, Barbarian (7 Energy + 2 Power); 143.4 has them enter exhausted, so they attack from the following turn.
  2. Standard-move both to the enemy battlefield (144.3 makes multiple simultaneous Standard Moves one action to a shared destination). Contested applies (190.3.a.1), the Combat is staged (323.9) and opens (323.13), and 464.2.c.3 designates them Attackers.
  3. Inside the opened Combat Showdown, play SFD-145 Switcheroo from hand for 2 Energy + 2 Power (155, 806.1.b, 464.2.f.1). Choose the Poro and the enemy defender - never Tryndamere, per 433.1.c.
  4. 433.1.b resolves it as +6 to the Poro and -6 to the defender for the turn: the Poro is Might 8 and the defender is Might 2.
  5. The damage step assigns the defender its minimum lethal 2 out of your 16 summed Might (465.2.c, 465.2.c.4), leaving 14 excess assigned to enemy units.
  6. You win the combat and Conquer (466.5, 466.5.d). Tryndamere's trigger checks 'if you assigned 5 or more excess damage' and you score 1 point (194.1.c; R2 = A makes that a point Gain by ability, not a 469 Score).

Per iteration

one Switcheroo turns a 2-excess attack into a 14-excess one, which is the difference between Tryndamere firing and not firing

How it ends

one point per Conquer, and 470 caps Scoring at one per battlefield per turn with 485.4 putting two battlefields on a Duel table; three Switcheroo (103.2.b) is three such turns - an engine, not a burst

Sources

Published elsewhere

Walked here, in this project

How this entry was audited

REFUTE = a refutation pass, with its date and verdict · WOUNDED = the pass found a flaw and the entry was rewritten · BUDGETED = the pass checked the recycle-and-draw ledger · lens = the hunt that proposed it.

HAND-WALKED 2026-09-07 (issue #187, uncited-rules-blocks slice: 433 Swap). Rule 433 is cited by NO entry and no synergy rule in the project, and SFD-145 Switcheroo was in ZERO combo entries before this one - which also corrects the CLAUDE.md line from #119 saying 'Swap (433) has one real user, Switcheroo, already in eight entries'; the eight are synergy-rule instances, not entries. Card text verbatim from data/corpus_flat.txt. Citations opened: 103.1.b.2, 103.2.b, 103.2.d.2, 143.4, 144.3, 155, 190.3.a.1, 323.9, 323.13, 433.1, 433.1.a, 433.1.b, 433.1.c, 464.2.c.3, 464.2.f.1, 465.2.c, 465.2.c.4, 466.5, 466.5.d, 470, 477.3.e.2.a, 485.4, 806.1.b, 807.1.c, 809.1.c, 811.1.b, 811.1.d.2, 194.1.c. Trap check: 433.1.c is named and is the reason the Poro is a uses[] row; the [Hidden] mode is scoped to defence; the swap is a snapshot, not a mirror; R28 = A is the excess-damage definition and R2 = A the point classification; no unruled reading. REVISED 2026-10-26 (#472, the follow-up PR #471 listed for #464): CHECKED note on the arithmetic notable: the declared board holds, because the swapped defender deals 2 and kills nobody; against a bigger garrison with no damage marked the point needs the rest of it to sum 5 or less beside a Might 8 defender, or the garrison's damage kills Tryndamere (465.2.c, 465.2.c.3). No class or status change. No unruled reading beyond R2 = A and R28 = A.

Walked against Core Rules 2026-07-16

Match a deck list against the whole catalogue